Agreement Among The States To Elect The President By National Popular Vote

Opponents of a national referendum argue that the Electoral College is a fundamental part of the federal system created by the Constitutional Convention. In particular, with the Connecticut compromise, bicameral legislation – with proportional state representation in the House of Representatives and equal state representation in the Senate – has become a compromise between less populous states that fear dominating their interests and voices over-burned by larger states[40] and larger states that saw everything but proportional voting as an affront to the principles of democratic representation. Introduced. [41] The ratio of the population of the most populous and least populated states is currently much greater (66.10 at the time of the 2010 census) than when the Connecticut compromise was adopted (7.35 at the time of the 1790 census), which exaggerates the non-proportional aspect of the allocation of the compromise. However, it was argued that the pact would condense the electoral power of states to the detriment of non-compact states and thus violate the „compact“ clause. The use of intergovernmental pacts to allow states to be concerned at the expense of states that are not parties to the pacts may well be a political concern. Based on population estimates, some states that have adopted the pact are expected to lose one or two votes due to the distribution of Congress after the 2020 census, which could increase the number of additional states needed to pass the measure. [156] The project has been supported by editorials in newspapers, including the New York Times,[11] of the Chicago Sun-Times, the Los Angeles Times,[15] The Boston Globe,[16] and the Minneapolis Star Tribune,[17] arguing that the current system discourages turnout and leaves only a few states and a few subjects, while a popular election would balance the vote. Others argued against this, including the Honolulu Star Bulletin. [18] Pete du Pont, a former Governor of Delaware, called the project an „urban power grab“ in a statement published in the Wall Street Journal, which would completely shift politics to urban issues in populated states and bring in small candidates. [19] The League of Women Voters has assembled a collection of readings for and con.

[20] Some of the most common talking points are listed below: This agreement ends when the Electoral College is abolished.