On an exceptional basis, the Union invites the United Kingdom to participate, in the context of the EU delegation, in meetings or meetings of these bodies, where the Union considers that the UK`s presence is necessary and is in the interests of the Union, particularly for the effective implementation of these agreements during the transitional period; this presence is only permitted if the participation of Member States is authorised by the existing agreements. The United Kingdom ensures that all specific obligations arising from Community agreements with third countries or international organisations concerning nuclear equipment, nuclear materials or other nuclear elements present in the United Kingdom at the end of the transition period are fulfilled, or to conclude, by other means, appropriate arrangements in agreement with the third country or an international organisation concerned. After an unprecedented vote on 4 December 2018, MEPs ruled that the UK government was not respecting Parliament because it refused to give Parliament full legal advice on the consequences of its proposed withdrawal terms.  The focus of the consultation was on the legal effect of the „backstop“ agreement for Northern Ireland, the Republic of Ireland and the rest of the United Kingdom with regard to the CUSTOMS border between the EU and the United Kingdom and its impact on the Good Friday agreement that led to the end of the unrest in Northern Ireland, including whether , according to the proposals, the UK would be certain that it would be able to leave the EU in a practical sense. The withdrawal agreement also contains provisions for the United Kingdom to leave the Convention setting the status of European schools, with the United Kingdom bound by the Convention and accompanying regulations on accredited European schools until the end of the last academic year of the transition period, i.e. at the end of the spring semester 2020-2021.  The British Minister of Justice called the law an „insurance policy“ or a „glass break in an emergency“. The Justice Minister said the UK government would only invoke the powers in the bill if the EU and the UK failed to reach an agreement and the EU had acted „unreasonablely.“ It is also unclear how the safeguards in Article 16 of the Protocol could apply, since they provide for unilateral measures, either from the United Kingdom or the EU, where the application of the protocol „leads to serious economic, social or ecological difficulties that may persist, or a diversion of trade“17.17 The result is the dilemma that British constitutional lawyers are familiar with and which is the subject of much discussion during the duration of the UK`s accession to the EU. If a British court were to implement substantial law provisions of national law which, in turn, clearly and, admittedly, violates the OBLIGATIONs of the United Kingdom and that they acquire internal legal effects through legislation guaranteeing the orderly withdrawal of the United Kingdom from the EU, or should a court make these provisions incompatible with the withdrawal agreement and not by legal arrangements incompatible with the Do Not Take It Back Agreement? The notification must indicate the provisions that the complainant intends to suspend. Before deciding to suspend parts of an agreement covered in point (b), the complainant first considers whether the suspension of the provision of this agreement in point (a) would be an appropriate response to the offence.
Any stay is proportionate to the breach of the undertaking at issue, given the seriousness of the violation and the rights at issue and, if the stay is based on the respondent`s continued non-compliance with the arbitration panel`s recourse under section 173, if the respondent was bound and paid or is still paid by the respondent.